Join the CNET UK Advisory Panel
Anonymous User
log in | register
You are here: CNET UK > Forums > Other Technology
Topic started by pr0se on 20 February 2009
4 Posts
pr0se [Abacus] Joined: 20 Feb 2009 Posts: 1
20 February 2009, 04:08 pm
In the past I have been a big fan of Canon printers. That was until I started getting a message from my 18-month old IP3000 that the ink absorber was almost full and that I should contact a service representative. The cost of service would be at least as much as a new printer, so I was happy to deal with this myself; all I needed were the service instructions. Canon refused to provide these, insisting that I would have to go to one of their approved agents. So effectively Canon have a built in "self-destruct" mechanism for their printers. Either they have deliberately made the ink absorber unserviceable or there is a design fault which has the same effect. As I sure I am not alone in coming across this problem that there must be tonnes of otherwise decent kit being consigned to land-fill
Jasebabe [Deep Thought] Joined: 6 Jan 2008 Posts: 598
20 February 2009, 11:16 pm
I think this is all part of the printer companies' plan to destroy the earth. You can buy a new colour printer now for about 50p which you do because a set of ink cartridges cost more than a new car and you think that there will be a fresh set of cartridges supplied with the printer. The bad news is that the cartridges that come in the box don't have quite enough ink in them to print a letter of complaint to the manufacturer. 8^(
Themisive [Abacus] Joined: 6 Dec 2007 Posts: 26
27 February 2009, 03:14 pm
I had a similar problem with a Canon, an S400. What had happened was that when the head was cleaned, a lot of waste ink accumulated inside the machine, and I ended up not being able to use the printer! Canon told me it would cost £80 for them to service it, then I would have to pack it and send it to them at my own cost - I would estimate another £10. Needless to say, I looked for a more modern machine, and ended up with a Canon PIXMA iP3300, it cost £50, effectively saving around £40! By the way, I've had a few bad experiences with compatible cartridges - some are OK, but others are not really suitable, so the only advice i can give here is "Caveat Emptor" - "let the buyer beware"
jotommo [Abacus] Joined: 4 Jun 2009 Posts: 2
4 June 2009, 02:36 pm
Hi, you guys have all experienced what I have, but in my case with Epson printers. The absorption tray; the new printer not containing full cartridges, the cost of repair, etc etc. I got the next Epson up from my last one and too late discovered I can't print onto my inkjet acetate! How is that an improvement? I'm going backward! I will have to pass this one onto my kids and I'm looking for a new printer. Can anyone recommend one that will scan detailed colour artwork and print to a high quality in archival ink, as I'm so over listening to the sales people and I can't possibly take in all the technology:- ppm, dpi...arrrgh! I just need it to scan and print beautifully. I can make my own breakfast. Thanks for reading this!
Number of posts per page: 10 | 20 | 30
ViewSonic VNB101
HP Photosmart Premium C309g
Sony Vaio X series (VPCX11S1E/B)
Sony Ericsson Aino
20 February 2009, 04:08 pm